What criteria does an examiner use to grant an interview after final rejection?

Question

Accepted Answer

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based) BlueIron Update: 2024-09-10 10 Rules 5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. An examiner will grant an interview after final rejection if they believe it can lead to a resolution with minimal additional consideration. According to MPEP 713.09 : Such an interview may be granted if the examiner is convinced that disposal or clarification for appeal may be accomplished with only nominal further consideration. This means the examiner must see a clear path to either allowing the application or clarifying issues for appeal without extensive additional work. Related Rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure 10 rules Collapse Interview Permitted for Clarification Before Appeal MPEP 713.09 Permitted Interview Permitted for Expedited Appeal MPEP 713.09 Permitted Interviews Required After Notice of Appeal MPEP 713.09 Timely Amendments After Final Rejection Must Be Considered for Allowability MPEP 714.13 Recommended Interview to Bridge Examiner-Applicant Gap MPEP 713 Permitted Interviews Must Clarify Application Issues MPEP 713 Recommended Permitted Interview to Resolve Issues Before Appeal MPEP 713.09 Recommended Interviews to Discuss New Limitations Should Be Denied MPEP 713.09 Recommended Interviews Permitted After Shortened Period Before Maximum MPEP 713.09 Permitted Interviews to Advance Patent Prosecution MPEP 713 Other Related FAQs 5 FAQs Collapse Can multiple interviews be conducted after a final rejection? When can an interview be conducted after a final rejection? What should be done before requesting an interview after final rejection? What is the time frame for conducting interviews after final rejection? What types of interview requests are likely to be denied after final rejection?