What constitutes a complete reply to a 37 CFR 1.105 requirement?

Question

Accepted Answer

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based) BlueIron Update: 2024-09-10 10 Rules 5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. A complete reply to a 37 CFR 1.105 requirement involves responding to each enumerated request for information by either: Providing the required information, or Stating that the information is unknown and/or not readily available to the requested party or parties. As stated in MPEP 704.12(b) : “A complete reply to a 37 CFR 1.105 requirement is a reply to each enumerated requirement for information giving either the information required or a statement that the information required to be submitted is unknown and/or is not readily available to the party or parties from which it was requested.” Related Rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure 10 rules Collapse Requirement for Information Under 37 CFR 1.105 MPEP 704.12(b) Required Good Faith Effort Required for Information Request MPEP 704.12(b) Required Requirement for Follow-Up When Reasonable and Warranted MPEP 704.12(b) Permitted Unknown Information Reply Generally Sufficient MPEP 704.12(b) Required Petition to Withdraw or Modify 105 Requirement MPEP 704.14(c) Permitted Petitions Do Not Extend Reply Period for 37 CFR 1.105 Requirement MPEP 704.14(c) Unknown Information Reply Allowed MPEP 704.12(b) Required Request for New Argument Based on Recent Decision at Oral Hearing MPEP 1002.02(j) Board Proceeding Record Available to Public MPEP 103 Requirement for First Examiner Rejection Date MPEP 1134.01 Other Related FAQs 5 FAQs Collapse What are the time limits for responding to an examiner&#8217;s requirement for information under MPEP 704? Do applicants need to prove that required information was not readily attainable? How should applicants respond if information remains unknown after a reasonable inquiry? Can a follow-up requirement b...