How does the USPTO currently classify patent drawings?

Question

Accepted Answer

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based) BlueIron Update: 2024-09-09 10 Rules 5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. The USPTO has changed its approach to classifying patent drawings. According to MPEP 608.02(i) , “the Office no longer considers drawings as formal or informal.” This means that the traditional distinction between formal and informal drawings has been eliminated. Instead, the focus is on whether the drawings are sufficient for publication and examination purposes, regardless of their formal classification. Related Rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure 10 rules Collapse Drawings Cannot Be Transferred Between Applications MPEP 608.02(i) Prohibited Drawings May Be Acceptable If Readable and Reproducible MPEP 608.02(i) Permitted Full and Clear Disclosure Required for Patent MPEP 608 Required Requirement for Full and Clear Disclosure MPEP 608 Claims Must Find Basis in Original Disclosure MPEP 608 Required No New Matter After Filing Date MPEP 608 Permitted Original Disclosure Requirement for Filing MPEP 608 Permitted Examiner Must Object to Offensive Language and Depictions in Patent Applications MPEP 608 Recommended Language and Drawings Must Be Resolved Before Publication MPEP 608 Recommended Requirement for Design Application Practice MPEP 608 Other Related FAQs 5 FAQs Collapse Can drawings be transferred from one pending application to another? What makes patent drawings acceptable for USPTO publication and examination? What are the current USPTO requirements for patent drawings? Who is responsible for pointing out and distinctly claiming the invention in a patent application? Can new terms be introduced in patent claims after the initial filing?