What happens if a prior-filed application lacks adequate written description for a claimed invention?

If a prior-filed application lacks adequate written description for a claimed invention, the following consequences may occur:

  • The claim in the later-filed application will not be entitled to the benefit of the filing date of the prior-filed application for that invention.
  • The effective filing date for the claimed invention will be the filing date of the later-filed application.
  • This may impact the patent’s validity if intervening prior art exists between the filing dates of the prior-filed and later-filed applications.

As stated in MPEP 211.05:

To be entitled to the benefit of the filing date of an earlier-filed application, the later-filed application must be an application for a patent for an invention which is also disclosed in the prior application (the parent or earlier-filed nonprovisional application or provisional application for which benefit is claimed); the disclosure of the invention in the prior application and in the later-filed application must be sufficient to comply with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112(a) except for the best mode requirement.

This emphasizes the importance of ensuring that the prior-filed application contains a complete and detailed disclosure of the claimed invention.

To learn more:

Topics: MPEP 200 - Types and Status of Application; Benefit and Priority, Patent Law, Patent Procedure
Tags: effective filing date, patent validity, prior-filed application, Written Description