Can a CPA be filed for utility or plant applications?

Question

Accepted Answer

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based) BlueIron Update: 2024-09-09 10 Rules 5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. No, Continued Prosecution Applications (CPAs) cannot be filed for utility or plant applications. The MPEP clearly states: Effective July 14, 2003, continued prosecution application (CPA) practice was eliminated as to utility and plant applications. For utility and plant applications, applicants should consider filing a request for continued examination (RCE) under 37 CFR 1.114 or a new application under 37 CFR 1.53(b) instead. Related Rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure 10 rules Collapse Inventors May Obtain Patents for New Processes, Machines, Manufactures, or Compositions of Matter MPEP 201 Permitted Patent for Distinct Plant Varieties MPEP 201 Permitted Patent Rules for Plants MPEP 201 Required Requirement for New Ornamental Design MPEP 201 Permitted Design Patents Apply Invention Rules Except Otherwise Provided MPEP 201 Required Specification and Drawings Required for Filing Date MPEP 201 Required Patent Applications Cover Three Broad Types of Subject Matter MPEP 201 Permitted Prior Art Search for Claims MPEP 706 Review Claims with Prior Art MPEP 706 Recommended Examiner Must Clearly Articulate Rejections Early MPEP 706 Other Related FAQs 5 FAQs Collapse How are continuation or divisional applications filed under former 37 CFR 1.62 treated after its deletion? What happens if a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) is filed after the issue fee has been paid? How does CPA practice differ for utility and plant applications? What happens if an improper CPA is filed for a utility or plant application? When should Form Paragraph 2.35 be used in patent examination?