What is the difference between a CPA in utility/plant applications and design applications?
There is a significant difference in how Continued Prosecution Applications (CPAs) are treated for utility/plant applications versus design applications. According to the examiner’s note in MPEP ¶ 2.35:
If the request for a CPA in a utility or plant application is improper and the CPA has been treated as an RCE, do not use this form paragraph (use form paragraph 7.42.15 instead). See MPEP § 706.07(h).
This indicates that for utility or plant applications, an improper CPA request is treated as a Request for Continued Examination (RCE). However, for design applications, CPA requests are generally accepted and processed as described in MPEP ¶ 2.35. This distinction is important for applicants to understand when considering their continued prosecution options.
For more information on CPA, visit: CPA.
For more information on design patents, visit: design patents.
For more information on patent application types, visit: patent application types.
For more information on plant patents, visit: plant patents.
For more information on RCE, visit: RCE.
For more information on utility patents, visit: utility patents.