What happens if a new inventor is identified in a CPA without proper documentation?

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-09

This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice.

If a new inventor is identified in a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) without proper documentation, it can lead to issues with the application. The MPEP ¶ 2.33 states:

It is noted that [1] identified as a named inventor in the Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) filed under 37 CFR 1.53(d) on [2], but no request under 37 CFR 1.48, as is required, was filed to correct the inventorship.

This means that if an examiner notices a new inventor listed on a CPA without the required request under 37 CFR 1.48, they will issue a notice to the applicant. The inventorship will remain the same as in the prior application until the proper request is filed and approved.

For more information on CPA, visit: CPA.

For more information on inventorship, visit: inventorship.

For more information on patent examination, visit: patent examination.

Topics: MPEP 200 – Types and Status of Application; Benefit and Priority MPEP 201 – Types of Applications Patent Law Patent Procedure
Tags: Composition Category, Disclosure Individuals, Disclosure Timing, Plant Distinct Variety, Plant Subject Matter