What is the difference in priority claim requirements for design applications compared to utility applications?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-09
This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice.
The main differences in priority claim requirements for design applications compared to utility applications are:
- Time limit: Design applications can claim priority at any time during pendency, while utility applications have specific deadlines
- Restoration of priority: Not applicable to design applications
MPEP 214.01 states: “The time periods set forth in 37 CFR 1.55(d) do not apply to design applications.” Additionally, “In a design application, a claim for priority may be made at any time during the pendency of the application.”
However, both design and utility applications must still meet other requirements, such as providing a certified copy of the foreign application and properly identifying the priority application.
Topics:
MPEP 200 - Types and Status of Application; Benefit and Priority Claims
MPEP 214-Formal Requirements of Claim for Foreign Priority
Patent Law
Patent Procedure