What happens if an applicant submits a statement to invoke the AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) exception?

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-10

This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice.

When an applicant submits a statement to invoke the AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) exception, the examiner must carefully consider the statement and its implications. The MPEP provides specific guidance:

‘If the applicant disqualifies the subject matter relied upon by the examiner in accordance with AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) and the procedures in MPEP § 717.02(b), the examiner should treat the application as if the disqualified prior art was not in the application.’

This means that if the statement is properly made and meets all requirements:

  • The examiner must disregard the disqualified prior art for the purposes of AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) rejections
  • The examination will proceed as if that prior art did not exist in the context of novelty and non-obviousness determinations
  • The examiner may need to reconsider any previously made rejections based on the now-disqualified prior art

It’s important to note that the exception only applies to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art and does not affect other bases for rejection.

Tags: AIA, Applicant Statement, patent examination, prior art exception