How is the enablement requirement different from the written description requirement?

The enablement requirement and the written description requirement are separate and distinct aspects of 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph. The MPEP clarifies this distinction:

The enablement requirement of 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph, is separate and distinct from the written description requirement.

This distinction is further explained in the case Vas-Cath, Inc. v. Mahurkar, 935 F.2d 1555, 1563, 19 USPQ2d 1111, 1116-17 (Fed. Cir. 1991), which states that “the purpose of the ‘written description’ requirement is broader than to merely explain how to ‘make and use’.”

While the enablement requirement focuses on providing sufficient information for a skilled person to make and use the invention, the written description requirement ensures that the inventor has fully described the invention and demonstrated possession of it at the time of filing.

To learn more:

Topics: MPEP 2100 - Patentability, MPEP 2164 - The Enablement Requirement, Patent Law, Patent Procedure
Tags: 35 u.s.c. 112(a), enablement requirement, Vas-Cath V. Mahurkar, Written Description Requirement