How does inventor intent affect experimental use in patent law?

Inventor intent is crucial in determining whether an activity qualifies as experimental use. However, subjective intent alone is not sufficient. The MPEP states: “When sales are made in an ordinary commercial environment and the goods are placed outside the inventor’s control, an inventor’s secretly held subjective intent to ‘experiment,’ even if true, is unavailing without objective evidence to support the contention.” (MPEP 2133.03(e)(2))

Objective evidence of experimental intent is necessary, especially when the invention is sold or used in a commercial context. The customer must be made aware of the experimental nature of the use or sale.

To learn more:

Topics: MPEP 2100 - Patentability, MPEP 2133.03(E) - Permitted Activity; Experimental Use, Patent Law, Patent Procedure
Tags: Experimental Use, Inventor Intent, Objective Evidence, patent law