Who determines if an appeal brief is compliant in ex parte reexamination?

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-29

This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice.

Since May 25, 2010, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board) has the sole responsibility for determining whether appeal briefs filed in ex parte reexamination proceedings comply with 37 CFR 41.37. The MPEP states:

“The Board also has the sole responsibility for determining whether corrected briefs comply with 37 CFR 41.37, and addresses any inquiries and petitions regarding notices of non-compliant briefs.”

Examiners are no longer required to review appeal briefs for compliance or to hold any appeal briefs defective. The Board corresponds directly with the appellant on non-compliant brief issues.

Topics: MPEP 2200 - Citation Of Prior Art And Ex Parte Reexamination Of Patents MPEP 2274 - Appeal Brief Patent Law Patent Procedure
Tags: Fees 1 17, Reexamination Appeals, Reexamination Cru, Reexamination Order, Request Fee