When is a priority showing required in patent applications?

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-30

This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice.

A priority showing is required in the following circumstances:

  • When complying with 37 CFR 41.202(a)(2) to suggest an interference
  • To overcome a rejection based on pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) or 102(e) when an affidavit is not permitted under 37 CFR 1.131(a)(1)
  • When the examiner requires it due to the application’s earliest constructive reduction-to-practice being later than that of a patent or published application

The MPEP states: “If no showing has been filed, and the application’s earliest constructive reduction-to-practice is later than the earliest constructive reduction-to-practice of a patent or published application, then the examiner must require a showing of priority.”

Topics: MPEP 2300 - Interference And Derivation Proceedings MPEP 2305 - Requiring A Priority Showing Patent Law Patent Procedure
Tags: Aia Practice, Contested Case Jurisdiction, Interference Declaration, Published Application Prior Art, Testimony Request