What should I know about multiple copending reexamination proceedings?

Question

Accepted Answer

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based) BlueIron Update: 2024-09-30 10 Rules 5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. The MPEP 2241 mentions multiple copending reexamination proceedings and directs readers to additional resources for more information: “See the last portion of MPEP § 2240 and also see MPEP § 2283 for multiple copending reexamination proceedings.” This reference indicates that there are specific procedures and considerations when dealing with multiple reexamination proceedings for the same patent. Patent practitioners and examiners should consult MPEP 2240 and MPEP 2283 for detailed guidance on handling such situations, including how to coordinate and manage the various proceedings efficiently. Related Rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure 10 rules Collapse Subsequent Ex Parte Reexamination Requests Must Raise New Question MPEP 2240 Recommended Amendments Not Considered in Ex Parte Reexamination MPEP 2240 Office May Initiate Reexamination of Non-Request Claim MPEP 2240 Permitted Requirement for Multiple Copending Ex Parte Reexamination Proceedings MPEP 2283 Substantial New Question Depends on Cited Prior Art in Second Ex Parte Reexamination Request MPEP 2240 No Patent Owner Input Before Determination Unless Requested MPEP 2240 Litigation Review Required for Ex Parte Reexamination MPEP 2240 Recommended Director Must Determine Substantial New Question of Patentability Within Three Months MPEP 2240 Director May Determine New Patentability Questions MPEP 2240 Permitted Patent Litigation Review Required Before Reexamination Determination MPEP 2240 Required Other Related FAQs 5 FAQs Collapse What happens if the 3-month period for deciding a reexamination request ends on a non-business day? What is the time limit for deciding on a reexamination request under 35 U.S.C. 302? Is there a t...