What role does the “particular machine” consideration play in the overall patent eligibility analysis?

The “particular machine” consideration plays a significant role in the overall patent eligibility analysis, particularly in the context of the Alice/Mayo test. Here’s how it fits into the broader analysis:

  • It’s part of Step 2A Prong Two and Step 2B of the Alice/Mayo test.
  • In Step 2A Prong Two, it can help determine if the abstract idea is integrated into a practical application.
  • In Step 2B, it can contribute to the “significantly more” analysis.
  • A particular machine can potentially transform an abstract idea into patent-eligible subject matter.

MPEP 2106.05(b) states: “The particularity or generality of the elements of the machine or apparatus, i.e., the degree to which the machine in the claim can be specifically identified (not any and all machines) is a factor in considering whether it is a ‘particular machine.'”

The MPEP further clarifies: “Whether its involvement is extra-solution activity or a field-of-use, i.e., the extent to which (or how) the machine or apparatus imposes meaningful limits on the claim. Use of a machine that contributes only nominally or insignificantly to the execution of the claimed method (e.g., in a data gathering step or in a field-of-use limitation) would not integrate a judicial exception or provide significantly more.”

To learn more:

Topics: MPEP 2100 - Patentability, MPEP 2106.05(B) - Particular Machine, Patent Law, Patent Procedure
Tags: Abstract Idea, Alice/Mayo Test, Particular Machine, Patent Eligibility