What is the significance of 37 CFR 1.515(c) in patent reexamination?

Question

Accepted Answer

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based) BlueIron Update: 2024-09-29 10 Rules 5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. 37 CFR 1.515(c) is a regulation that allows for a petition to challenge an examiner’s determination in a reexamination proceeding. The MPEP § 2255 states: “However, if a petition under 37 CFR 1.515(c) is granted after an examiner’s determination that found the request did not raise any SNQ, the reexamination will generally be conducted by another examiner.” This regulation provides a mechanism for requesting a review of the examiner’s decision, particularly when the examiner has found that no Substantial New Question of patentability (SNQ) was raised. If such a petition is granted, it can lead to the assignment of a different examiner for the reexamination. Related Rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure 10 rules Collapse Reexamination Generally Conducted by Another Examiner After SNQ Petition Grant MPEP 2255 Substantial New Question of Patentability Requires Ex Parte Reexamination MPEP 2246 Substantial New Question of Patentability Present Unless Decided MPEP 2242 Substantial New Question of Patentability Can Be Re-Presented MPEP 2242 Permitted Substantial New Question of Patentability Must Be Addressed MPEP 2246 Recommended Substantial New Question of Patentability Required for Reexamination MPEP 2240 Ex Parte Reexamination Conducted by Different Examiner MPEP 2246 Examiner Determines Substantial New Question of Patentability Within Three Months MPEP 2240 Requirement for Substantial New Question of Patentability MPEP 2216 Substantial New Question of Patentability Based on Old Art in a New Light MPEP 2216 Permitted Other Related FAQs 5 FAQs Collapse Are there exceptions to who conducts a reexamination? What is an SNQ in patent reexamination? Who typically conducts ex parte reexa...