What is the purpose of MPEP ¶ 2.32 in relation to Continued Prosecution Applications?

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-09

This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice.

MPEP ¶ 2.32 provides guidance for patent examiners on how to respond to requests for deleting a named inventor in a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) for design patents. The paragraph serves several purposes:

  • It offers a template for examiners to acknowledge receipt of a statement requesting inventor deletion.
  • It confirms that the inventorship has been corrected as requested.
  • It clarifies the timing and requirements for inventorship changes in CPAs.

The paragraph states: Receipt is acknowledged of the statement requesting that [1] be deleted as a named inventor which was filed with the Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) on [2]. The inventorship has been corrected as requested.

This standardized language ensures consistent communication between the USPTO and applicants regarding inventorship changes in CPAs.

For more information on CPA, visit: CPA.

For more information on patent examination, visit: patent examination.

For more information on USPTO communication, visit: USPTO communication.

Topics: MPEP 200 – Types and Status of Application; Benefit and Priority MPEP 201 – Types of Applications Patent Law Patent Procedure
Tags: Composition Category, Disclosure Individuals, Disclosure Timing, Plant Distinct Variety, Plant Subject Matter