What is the process for submitting new or amended drawings in a reexamination proceeding?

Question

Accepted Answer

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based) BlueIron Update: 2024-09-30 10 Rules 5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. The process for submitting new or amended drawings in a reexamination proceeding involves several steps: Submit a sketch in permanent ink showing proposed changes/amendments on a separate paper labeled as “Annotated Sheet.” Wait for examiner approval of the proposed changes. Upon approval, submit new sheets of drawings for each drawing sheet that is to be changed/amended. Ensure compliance with 37 CFR 1.530(d)(3) by marking each figure as “amended” or “new” if applicable. File the new sheets of drawings before the preparation of the Notice of Intent to Issue Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate (NIRC). The MPEP states: “Once the proposed changes are approved, sheets of substitute or new drawings must be submitted for each drawing sheet that is to be changed/amended.” Related Rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure 10 rules Collapse Amendments to Patent Drawings Must Be on New Sheets MPEP 2250.01 Annotated Sheet Must Be Submitted for Proposed Changes MPEP 2250.01 Recommended Amendment of Drawings in Reexamination Proceeding Required MPEP 2250 New Drawings Must Be Filed Before NIRC MPEP 2250.01 Required Amendments Must Be New Sheets MPEP 2250.01 Required Sketch Required for Drawing Amendment Approval MPEP 2250.01 Recommended No Changes to Original Patent Drawings MPEP 2250.01 Prohibited New Drawings Required Before Certificate Issuance MPEP 2250.01 Submit Amended or New Drawings After Approval MPEP 2250.01 Required Drawings Must Remain Unchanged During Reexamination MPEP 2250.01 Other Related FAQs 5 FAQs Collapse How can patent drawings be corrected during ex parte reexamination? What happens if new drawing sheets are not timely filed in response to a Quayle action during reexaminati...