What is the panel review process in patent reexamination?

Question

Accepted Answer

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based) BlueIron Update: 2024-09-30 10 Rules 5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. The panel review process is an additional layer of quality control in patent reexamination. According to MPEP § 2289 : “In addition to the CRU SPRS or TC QAS review of the reexamination cases, a panel review is made prior to issuing Office actions as set forth in MPEP § 2271.01.” This panel review helps ensure consistency and accuracy in the reexamination process before official actions are issued to patent applicants or owners. Related Rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure 10 rules Collapse Panel Review Before Issuing Office Actions MPEP 2289 Quality Assurance Specialist Review for Reexaminations MPEP 2289 Extensions Not Applicable for Ex Parte Reexamination MPEP 1213 Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate Required MPEP 1215.01 Recommended Extensions of Time for Ex Parte Reexamination MPEP 1208.01 Petitions to the Director for Ex Parte Reexamination Appeals and Other Matters MPEP 1002 Permitted Petitions for Appeal of Ex Parte Reexamination Before PTAB Transfer MPEP 1002.02(c) Request for Extension of Time in Ex Parte Reexamination Proceedings MPEP 1002.02(c) Director of CRU Decides Petitions in Ex Parte Reexamination MPEP 1002.02(c)(4) Extensions for Time Periods in Patent Applications and Ex Parte Reexaminations MPEP 1204 Other Related FAQs 5 FAQs Collapse What are the benefits of the reexamination review process? How does the USPTO ensure uniformity in reexamination practices? Who conducts reexamination reviews at the USPTO? No more FAQs can be generated How did the Patent and Trademark Office Authorization Act of 2002 change reexamination procedures?