What is the International Preliminary Examination Report (IPER)?

Question

Accepted Answer

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based) BlueIron Update: 2024-09-27 10 Rules 5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. The International Preliminary Examination Report (IPER), also known as the International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Chapter II of the Patent Cooperation Treaty), is a document established on Form PCT/IPEA/409. As stated in the MPEP, “ The international preliminary examination report contains, among other things, a statement (in the form of simple “yes” or “no”), in relation to each claim which has been examined, on whether the claim appears to satisfy the criteria of novelty, inventive step (non-obviousness) and industrial applicability. ” The report also includes citations of relevant documents and explanations supporting the examiner’s conclusions. Related Rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure 10 rules Collapse International Preliminary Examination Report Identifies Amended Basis MPEP 1879 Determination of Novelty, Inventive Step, and Industrial Applicability Must Be Made Separately for Each Claim MPEP 1879 Recommended Annexes Must Accompany International Preliminary Examination Report MPEP 1879 Required Timing for Establishing International Preliminary Examination Report MPEP 1879 Required Examiner Must Determine Claim Novelty, Inventive Step, and Industrial Applicability MPEP 1879 Required Examiner Must Determine Novelty, Inventive Step, and Industrial Applicability MPEP 1879 Conclusion Statement for Novelty, Inventive Step, and Industrial Applicability Must Be Accompanied by Supporting Citations and Explanations MPEP 1879 Required Examiner Must Determine Novelty, Inventive Step, and Industrial Applicability MPEP 1879 Recommended No Opinion on Patentability in International Preliminary Examination Report MPEP 1879 Prohibited Explanations Must Point to Novelty, Inv...