What information from copending U.S. patent applications needs to be disclosed?

Question

Accepted Answer

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based) BlueIron Update: 2024-09-29 10 Rules 5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. Individuals covered by 37 CFR 1.56 must disclose information about copending U.S. patent applications that are “material to patentability” of the application in question. This includes: Identification of pending or abandoned applications filed by at least one of the inventors or assigned to the same assignee Applications that disclose similar subject matter Prior art references from one application that are material to patentability of another application The MPEP emphasizes: [T]he applicant has the burden of presenting the examiner with a complete and accurate record to support the allowance of letters patent. It’s important to note that examiners cannot be assumed to be aware of all related applications, so applicants must bring this information to their attention. Related Rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure 10 rules Collapse Sources of Material Information Must Be Disclosed MPEP 2001.06 Permitted Individuals May Disclose Information to Patent Agent MPEP 2001 Permitted Material Information Must Be Disclosed to Office Regardless of Source MPEP 2001.06 Required Copending Applications Must Be Disclosed to Examiner MPEP 2001.06(b) Who Must Disclose Information for Patent Applications MPEP 2001.01 Individuals Must Disclose Copending Applications MPEP 2001.06(b) Individuals Must Disclose Material Information MPEP 2000 Material Information Must Be Disclosed During Prosecution MPEP 2001.06 Required Duty to Disclose Material Information to USPTO MPEP 2000.01 Duty to Disclose Material Information to USPTO MPEP 2000 Other Related FAQs 5 FAQs Collapse What sources of information are covered by the duty of disclosure under 37 CFR 1.56? How should information from related litigation and ...