What are the consequences of inequitable conduct in patent prosecution?

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-29

This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice.

The consequences of inequitable conduct in patent prosecution are severe. MPEP 2016 outlines that such conduct leads to the unenforceability of the entire patent. As stated in the J. P. Stevens & Co. v. Lex Tex Ltd. case:

“Inequitable conduct ‘goes to the patent right as a whole, independently of particular claims.’”

This means that if inequitable conduct is found, the patent holder cannot enforce any claims in the patent, regardless of which specific claims were directly affected by the misconduct. It’s a comprehensive sanction that emphasizes the importance of ethical behavior in patent prosecution.

Topics: Inequitable Conduct MPEP 2000 - Duty Of Disclosure MPEP 2016 - Fraud Or Violation Of Duty Of Disclosure Affects All Claims Patent Law Patent Procedure
Tags: Aia Effective Dates, But For Materiality, Inequitable Conduct Elements, Materiality Standard, Reissue Rejection