How should prior art be considered in patent examination?

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-29

This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice.

Prior art must be considered in its entirety during patent examination, including portions that may teach away from the claimed invention. The MPEP 2141.02 states:

“A prior art reference must be considered in its entirety, i.e., as a whole, including portions that would lead away from the claimed invention.”

This means that examiners should not cherry-pick only the parts of a reference that support an obviousness rejection while ignoring contradictory teachings. However, the MPEP also notes:

“the prior art’s mere disclosure of more than one alternative does not constitute a teaching away from any of these alternatives because such disclosure does not criticize, discredit, or otherwise discourage the solution claimed….”

Therefore, while all aspects of a prior art reference should be considered, the mere presence of alternative solutions does not necessarily negate its relevance to the claimed invention.

Topics: MPEP 2100 - Patentability MPEP 2141.02 - Differences Between Prior Art And Claimed Invention Patent Law Patent Procedure
Tags: Aia Practice, Claim Directed To, Composition Claims, Scope Content Prior Art