How does the USPTO handle prior art submissions in languages other than English for reexamination?

Question

Accepted Answer

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based) BlueIron Update: 2024-09-30 10 Rules 5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. When submitting prior art in languages other than English for reexamination, the USPTO has specific requirements. According to MPEP 2244 : “ If the prior art patents and printed publications are in a language other than English, any necessary translation should be included. “ This means that: Translations must be provided for non-English prior art The translation should be accurate and complete Both the original document and the translation should be submitted It’s crucial to provide translations to ensure that the examiner can fully understand and evaluate the relevance of the prior art to the patent claims under reexamination. Related Rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure 10 rules Collapse Examiner Can Use Any Prior Art MPEP 2244 Examiner Can Use Any Prior Art for SNQ Determination MPEP 2244 Examiner Can Use Any Prior Art In Determining Substantial New Question of Patentability MPEP 2244 Permitted Ex Parte Reexamination Consideration Limited to Patents and Publications MPEP 2217 Examiner Can Examine Unrequested Claims MPEP 2243 Permitted Primary Source of Patents and Publications for Ex Parte Reexamination MPEP 2244 Examiner Can Consider Patent File Submissions in Determination MPEP 2244 Permitted Office May Initiate Reexamination of Non-Requested Claims MPEP 2243 Permitted Examiner Can Use Multiple Sources for Determining Patentability MPEP 2244 Permitted Request Must Include Substantial New Question of Patentability MPEP 2216 Other Related FAQs 5 FAQs Collapse What is the basis for determining a &#8220;substantial new question of patentability&#8221; in ex parte reexamination? Can examiners perform additional prior art searches during reexamination? Can examiners consider p...