How does the USPTO evaluate claims of improved computer functionality in patent applications?

Question

Accepted Answer

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based) BlueIron Update: 2024-09-30 10 Rules 5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. The USPTO evaluates claims of improved computer functionality in patent applications by considering whether the claimed invention provides a technical improvement to the computer itself or to another technology. According to MPEP 2106.04(d)(1) : “[T]he claim must be evaluated to ensure the claim itself reflects the disclosed improvement in technology… That is, the claim must include the components or steps of the invention that provide the improvement described in the specification.” Examiners look for specific technical details in the claims that demonstrate how the improvement is achieved, rather than mere statements of intended results. Related Rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure 10 rules Collapse Improvement to Technology or Computer Functionality Not Abstract Idea MPEP 2106.04(d) Claim Must Include Significantly More Than Abstract Idea MPEP 2106 Prohibited Claim Must Include Additional Elements MPEP 2106.04(d) Permitted Claim Must Include Additional Limitations for Patent Eligibility MPEP 2106 Claim Must Integrate Judicial Exception into Practical Application MPEP 2106.04(d) Recommended Step 2A Prong Two Evaluates Eligibility Without Considering Routine Activity MPEP 2106.04(d) Claim Must Integrate Judicial Exception into Practical Application MPEP 2106.04(d) Claims Must Improve Technical Functioning MPEP 2106.04(d) Claims Not Directed to Computer Improvement MPEP 2106.04(d) Claim Interpretation Affects Eligibility Determination MPEP 2106 Other Related FAQs 5 FAQs Collapse How should examiners evaluate the improvement to technology in a patent application? What are some examples of claims that improve technology and are not directed to a judicial exception? How does the ...