How does the broadest reasonable interpretation (BRI) affect the examination of nature-based product claims?
The broadest reasonable interpretation (BRI) plays a crucial role in the examination of nature-based product claims. The MPEP Section 2106.04(b) explains:
“It is important to keep in mind that under the broadest reasonable interpretation (BRI) of the claims, a nature-based product limitation may encompass both eligible and ineligible products.”
Key points to understand:
- A claim may cover both products with markedly different characteristics and those without
- Examiners must consider the full scope of the claim under BRI
- If the BRI includes products of nature, further analysis in Step 2A Prong Two is required
- If a claim is rejected, examiners should suggest amendments to narrow the claim to eligible embodiments
This approach ensures a thorough examination of nature-based product claims, considering all possible interpretations within the claim’s scope.
To learn more:
Topics:
MPEP 2100 - Patentability,
MPEP 2106.04(B) - Laws Of Nature,
Natural Phenomena & Products Of Nature,
Patent Law,
Patent Procedure