How does pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c) affect anticipation rejections?

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-30

This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice.

Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c) specifically applies to obviousness rejections and does not affect anticipation rejections. The MPEP clearly states:

“Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c) applies only to prior art usable in an obviousness rejection under 35 U.S.C. 103. Subject matter that qualifies as anticipatory prior art under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 is not affected, and may still be used to reject claims as being anticipated.”

This means that even if prior art is disqualified under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c) for obviousness rejections, it can still be used for anticipation rejections under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102. It’s important for patent applicants and examiners to understand this distinction when considering the applicability of prior art.

Topics: MPEP 2100 - Patentability MPEP 2146.01 - Prior Art Disqualification Under Pre - Aia 35 U.S.C. 103(C) Patent Law Patent Procedure
Tags: Aia Practice, Snq Criteria