How does inherency apply to product-by-process claims?

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-29

This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice.

Inherency can apply to product-by-process claims in a similar manner as it does to other types of claims. The MPEP states: “The fact that a certain result or characteristic may occur or be present in the prior art is not sufficient to establish the inherency of that result or characteristic.” (MPEP 2112)

For product-by-process claims, the burden of proof for inherency is similar to that of other claims. The examiner may require the applicant to prove that the prior art products do not necessarily possess the characteristics of the claimed product. This principle is illustrated in cases like In re Fitzgerald, where the court examined whether a specific manufacturing process necessarily resulted in a product with certain characteristics.

For more detailed information on the burden of proof for product-by-process claims, refer to MPEP 2113.

Topics: MPEP 2100 - Patentability MPEP 2112 - Requirements Of Rejection Based On Inherency; Burden Of Proof Patent Law Patent Procedure
Tags: Aia Practice, Burden Proving Inherency, Determining Aia Status, Implicit Motivation, Prima Facie Case