How does AIA 35 U.S.C. 103 affect the determination of obviousness?

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-29

This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice.

AIA 35 U.S.C. 103 has modified the determination of obviousness in patent examination. The key changes include:

  • Elimination of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c), which provided a safe harbor for commonly owned prior art or prior art resulting from a joint research agreement.
  • Introduction of a new prior art exception under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for commonly owned disclosures or those subject to an obligation of assignment.
  • Expansion of the scope of prior art that can be used in obviousness rejections.

As stated in MPEP 2158: “AIA 35 U.S.C. 103 continues to apply the Graham v. John Deere Co. obviousness factors set forth in MPEP § 2141.”

Topics: MPEP 2100 - Patentability MPEP 2158 - Aia 35 U.S.C. 103 Patent Law Patent Procedure
Tags: Aia Practice