Can method claims reference limitations from apparatus claims?

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-30

This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice.

Yes, method claims can reference limitations from apparatus claims, as long as the reference is clear and does not introduce confusion. The MPEP 2173.05(f) provides an example of an acceptable reference:

“A method of producing ethanol comprising contacting amylose with the culture of claim 1 under the following conditions …..”

Additionally, the MPEP cites a relevant case:

“See also Ex parte Porter, 25 USPQ2d 1144 (Bd. Pat. App. & Inter. 1992) (where reference to “the nozzle of claim 7″ in a method claim was held to comply with 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph).”

These examples demonstrate that method claims can reference specific elements or entire apparatus claims, provided the reference is clear and does not create indefiniteness issues.

Topics: MPEP 2100 - Patentability MPEP 2173.05(F) - Reference To Limitations In Another Claim Patent Law Patent Procedure
Tags: Aia Practice