Can a patent examiner suggest amendments to claims to address written description issues?

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-30

This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice.

Yes, patent examiners can and often do suggest amendments to claims to address written description issues. This practice is encouraged as part of the examination process to help applicants overcome rejections and move their applications forward.

The MPEP 2163.04 states:

“When appropriate, suggest amendments to the claims which can be supported by the application’s written description, being mindful of the prohibition against the addition of new matter in the claims or description.”

However, examiners must be careful not to suggest amendments that would introduce new matter into the application. Any suggested amendments must be fully supported by the original disclosure to comply with the written description requirement and avoid new matter issues.

This guidance encourages a collaborative approach between examiners and applicants to resolve written description issues while maintaining the integrity of the patent application.

Topics: MPEP 2100 - Patentability MPEP 2163.04 - Burden On The Examiner With Regard To The Written Description Requirement Patent Law Patent Procedure
Tags: Aia Practice, claim form, Composition Claims, method claims, Sequence Format