Are there any more FAQs about MPEP 819 – Office Generally Does Not Permit Shift?

Question

Accepted Answer

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based) BlueIron Update: 2024-09-27 9 Rules 5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. No more FAQs can be generated for MPEP 819 – Office Generally Does Not Permit Shift. The key points of this section have been thoroughly covered in previously generated FAQs. The content of this MPEP section is relatively brief and focused, and additional questions would likely result in repetition or overlap with existing information. Related Rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure 9 rules Collapse Examiner Likely to Permit Shift Where No Additional Burden MPEP 819 Applicants Cannot Change Election After Office Action MPEP 819 Permitted Applicant Cannot Change Oral Election After Office Action MPEP 819 Prohibited RCE Not Allowed for Distinct Claims MPEP 819 Prohibited Claims Must Be Treated According to MPEP § 821.03 When Not Matching Elected Invention MPEP 819 Recommended Restriction Does Not Carry Over to Continuation MPEP 819 Original Restriction Does Not Carry to Continuation MPEP 819 Continuation Requirement for Design Applications MPEP 819 Examiner May Permit Invention Claim Shift MPEP 819 Prohibited Other Related FAQs 5 FAQs Collapse How does an election in a parent application affect a continued prosecution application (CPA) in design applications? Under what circumstances might an examiner permit a shift to claim another invention? Can an applicant file a Request for Continued Examination (RCE) to switch inventions? Does a restriction requirement in a parent application carry over to a continuation application? Can an applicant shift to claim another invention after an election is made?