What are the restrictions on a third-party requester’s rebuttal brief in inter partes reexamination?

The restrictions on a third-party requester’s rebuttal brief in inter partes reexamination are specified in MPEP 2678, which cites 37 CFR 41.71(c): “(1) The rebuttal brief of any requester may be directed to the examiner’s answer and/or the respondent brief of the owner. (2) The rebuttal brief of a requester may not be directed to…

Read More

What is the process for handling rebuttal briefs in inter partes reexamination?

The process for handling rebuttal briefs in inter partes reexamination involves several steps: The Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI) determines compliance with 37 CFR 1.943(c) and 37 CFR 41.71. The Central Reexamination Unit (CRU) retains jurisdiction over the proceeding until a docketing notice is entered. The Board reviews the rebuttal brief and forwards…

Read More

What happens after the examiner acknowledges a rebuttal brief?

After the examiner acknowledges a rebuttal brief, the following occurs: No further response from the examiner is typically required. Any additional replies or comments from any party will not be considered. The inter partes reexamination proceeding is forwarded to the Board for a decision on the appeal. The MPEP provides two examples of acknowledgments by…

Read More

When does the Central Reexamination Unit (CRU) retain jurisdiction in inter partes reexamination?

The Central Reexamination Unit (CRU) retains jurisdiction over the inter partes reexamination proceeding until specific conditions are met. According to MPEP 2679: “jurisdiction over the inter partes reexamination proceeding (i.e., to consider briefs, conduct an appeal conference, draft an examiner’s answer, and decide the entry of amendments, evidence, and information disclosure statements filed after the…

Read More