How do reversal, duplication, or rearrangement of parts affect patentability?
Reversal, duplication, or rearrangement of parts generally have limited impact on patentability unless they produce unexpected results or solve a specific problem. According to MPEP 2144.04, these changes are often considered obvious modifications. Reversal of Parts: “mere reversal of such movement… was held to be an obvious modification.” (In re Gazda) Duplication of Parts: “mere…
Read MoreWhat is the legal precedent for rearrangement of parts in patent claims?
What is the legal precedent for rearrangement of parts in patent claims? The legal precedent for rearrangement of parts in patent claims is established in MPEP 2144.04(VI)(C). This section cites the following case: “The particular placement of a contact in a conductivity measuring device was held to be an obvious matter of design choice.” –…
Read More