Who reviews the sufficiency of affidavits or declarations under 37 CFR 1.130?
The sufficiency of affidavits or declarations under 37 CFR 1.130 is reviewed and decided by a primary examiner. As stated in MPEP 717.01(e): The question of sufficiency of affidavits or declarations under 37 CFR 1.130 should be reviewed and decided by a primary examiner. This means that the primary examiner is responsible for evaluating whether…
Read MoreWho decides on the sufficiency of affidavits under 37 CFR 1.131(a)?
According to MPEP 715.08, the primary examiner is responsible for reviewing and deciding on the sufficiency of affidavits or declarations under 37 CFR 1.131(a). The MPEP states: The question of sufficiency of affidavits or declarations under 37 CFR 1.131(a) should be reviewed and decided by a primary examiner. This means that the primary examiner has…
Read MoreWhat authority does a primary examiner have regarding abandoned applications?
A primary examiner’s authority regarding abandoned applications is limited, but they do have some discretion. According to MPEP 711.03(a): While the primary examiner has no authority to act upon an application in which no action by applicant was taken during the period for reply, he or she may reverse his or her holding as to…
Read MoreHow does the patentability report process work within the USPTO?
The patentability report process within the USPTO involves several steps: The primary examiner identifies the need for a patentability report. A request is sent to the appropriate Technology Center Director. The Director assigns the report to an examiner with relevant expertise. The assigned examiner prepares the report, focusing on specific claims or aspects of the…
Read More