How can an applicant challenge a premature final rejection?
If an applicant believes a final rejection is premature, they can challenge it through a petition process. According to MPEP 706.07(c), the issue of prematureness “is reviewable by petition under 37 CFR 1.181.” This means that applicants can file a petition to the USPTO requesting a review of the premature final rejection. The MPEP directs…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle applications abandoned due to failure to timely reply?
The USPTO has specific procedures for handling applications abandoned due to failure to timely reply. According to MPEP 711.04(c): Where an applicant contends that the application is not in fact abandoned (e.g., there is disagreement as to the sufficiency of the reply, or as to controlling dates), a petition under 37 CFR 1.181(a) requesting withdrawal…
Read MoreWhat is the process for reviewing an examiner’s refusal to enter an affidavit as untimely?
If an examiner refuses to enter an affidavit as untimely, the review process is through a petition, not an appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. MPEP 715.09 clearly states: Review of an examiner’s refusal to enter an affidavit as untimely is by petition and not by appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal…
Read MoreHow can an examiner’s decision on affidavit sufficiency be reviewed?
The review process for an examiner’s decision on affidavit sufficiency under 37 CFR 1.131(a) involves two different paths, depending on the nature of the review: Formal sufficiency and propriety: MPEP 715.08 states: Review of an examiner’s decision with regard to questions of formal sufficiency and propriety of an affidavit or declaration under 37 CFR 1.131(a)…
Read MoreHow are questions of formal sufficiency and propriety of affidavits reviewed?
Questions of formal sufficiency and propriety of affidavits or declarations are reviewed through a specific process. According to MPEP 717.01(e): Review of questions of formal sufficiency and propriety are by petition filed under 37 CFR 1.181. Such petitions are answered by the Technology Center Directors (MPEP § 1002.02(c)). This means that if there are concerns…
Read MoreWhat is the process for expunging assignment records at the USPTO?
The process for expunging assignment records at the USPTO involves: Submitting a petition under 37 CFR 1.59 to expunge the assignment record Providing clear evidence that the document was submitted by mistake or is of improper character Paying the required petition fee As stated in MPEP 323.01(d): ‘The USPTO will not expunge any assignment records…
Read MoreAre there any limitations on expunging assignment records at the USPTO?
Yes, there are limitations on expunging assignment records at the USPTO. The MPEP 323.01(d) provides important guidance: ‘The USPTO will not expunge any assignment records that have been recorded absent a petition pursuant to 37 CFR 1.59.’ This indicates that: Expungement is not an automatic process and requires a formal petition Only recorded assignments can…
Read MoreWhat is the process for reviewing an examiner’s new matter rejection in the specification?
When an examiner issues a new matter rejection confined to amendments in the specification, the process for review is through a petition. This is distinct from new matter rejections in claims, which require an appeal. According to MPEP 608.04(c): “Where the new matter is confined to amendments to the specification, review of the examiner’s requirement…
Read MoreWhat happens if an inventor refuses to sign the patent application?
What happens if an inventor refuses to sign the patent application? If an inventor refuses to sign the patent application, the applicant may file a petition under 37 CFR 1.47(a). According to MPEP 605, ‘When an inventor refuses to sign the application oath or declaration or cannot be found or reached after diligent effort, the…
Read More