What should examiners do if an applicant challenges a well-known, routine, conventional activity assertion?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-29 10 Rules5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. When an applicant challenges an examiner’s assertion that certain elements…
Read MoreWhat should examiners do if an applicant argues that an additional element is not well-understood, routine, conventional activity?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-29 10 Rules5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. When an applicant argues that an additional element is not…
Read MoreDoes an examiner need TC Director approval to withdraw a tentative abstract idea rejection?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-29 10 Rules5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. No, an examiner does not need TC Director approval to…
Read MoreHow does the examination guidance relate to the substantive law on patent eligibility?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-29 10 Rules5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. The examination guidance, training materials, and examples provided by the…
Read MoreWhat is the evidentiary standard for subject matter eligibility rejections?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-29 10 Rules5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. The evidentiary standard for subject matter eligibility rejections varies depending…
Read MoreWhat evidence is required to support a finding that claim elements are well-understood, routine, and conventional?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-29 10 Rules5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. To support a finding that additional claim elements are well-understood,…
Read MoreHow is a claim with a tentative abstract idea evaluated for subject matter eligibility?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-29 10 Rules5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. When a claim contains a tentative abstract idea, it is…
Read MoreHow should examiners evaluate the improvement to technology in a patent application?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-29 10 Rules5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. Examiners should follow a two-step process to evaluate improvements to…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO evaluate “significantly more” in Step 2B of the subject matter eligibility analysis?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-29 10 Rules5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. The evaluation of “significantly more” occurs in Step 2B of…
Read MoreHow do examiners evaluate whether additional elements amount to significantly more?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-29 10 Rules5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. According to MPEP 2106.05, examiners should evaluate whether additional elements…
Read More