What is the difference between a combination and a subcombination in patent law?
In patent law, a combination is an organization of which a subcombination or element is a part. As stated in MPEP 806.05(a): “A combination is an organization of which a subcombination or element is a part.” This means that a combination claim includes multiple elements or components working together, while a subcombination claim focuses on…
Read MoreWhat is the difference between claims and species in patent law?
In patent law, claims and species are distinct concepts. According to MPEP 806.04(e): “Claims are definitions or descriptions of inventions. Claims themselves are never species. The scope of a claim may be limited to a single disclosed embodiment (i.e., a single species, and thus be designated a specific species claim).” In other words, claims define…
Read MoreWhat is the process for cancelling a claim lost in interference?
The process for cancelling a claim lost in interference is briefly mentioned in MPEP 1302.04(d), which states: “Cancellation of Claim Lost in Interference [R-08.2012] See MPEP Chapter 2300.”. This indicates that the detailed process is outlined in MPEP Chapter 2300, which covers interference proceedings in detail. To cancel a claim lost in interference, the examiner…
Read MoreWhat is the cancellation of claims to nonelected invention?
The cancellation of claims to nonelected invention refers to the process of removing claims from a patent application that were not chosen for examination. This typically occurs in applications where a restriction requirement has been made, and the applicant has elected to pursue only certain claims. According to MPEP 1302.04(c), “See MPEP § 821.01 and…
Read MoreCan a patent examiner change the title of my invention?
Yes, a patent examiner can change the title of your invention if it’s not specific to the claimed invention. The MPEP § 1302.04(a) implies this by stating: “Where the title of the invention is not specific to the invention as claimed, see MPEP § 606.01.” This reference to MPEP § 606.01 indicates that examiners are…
Read MoreCan the Board or Director remand a proceeding to consider new evidence?
Yes, the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI) or the Director of the USPTO has the authority to remand a proceeding to allow the examiner to consider new evidence. MPEP § 1211.03 states: “If such evidence has not been treated by the examiner, the Board or the Director may remand the proceeding to permit…
Read MoreHow does the Board handle affidavits submitted with a request for rehearing?
The Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI) generally does not remand affidavits or declarations submitted with a request for rehearing of its decision, unless a rejection has been made under 37 CFR 41.50(b). MPEP § 1211.03 states: “It is not the custom of the Board to remand affidavits or declarations offered in connection with…
Read MoreWhat should I do if the title of my invention is not specific to the claimed invention?
If the title of your invention is not specific to the claimed invention, you should refer to MPEP § 606.01 for guidance. The MPEP § 1302.04(a) directs patent examiners and applicants to this section: “Where the title of the invention is not specific to the invention as claimed, see MPEP § 606.01.” MPEP § 606.01…
Read MoreCan a claim lost in interference be reinstated or modified instead of cancelled?
While MPEP 1302.04(d) briefly mentions “Cancellation of Claim Lost in Interference [R-08.2012] See MPEP Chapter 2300“, it doesn’t provide details on alternatives to cancellation. However, based on the practices outlined in MPEP Chapter 2300, there are some potential alternatives to outright cancellation: Modification: In some cases, the applicant may be able to modify the lost…
Read MoreWhat is the significance of an allowable linking claim in a transitional application?
An allowable linking claim in a transitional application has significant implications for the application process, as outlined in MPEP 803.03(a). The key significance is: “Whenever divided inventions in a transitional application are rejoined because a linking claim is allowable ( MPEP § 809 , § 821.04 , and § 821.04(a) ) …” This statement indicates…
Read More