What is the significance of “identical” claims in patent reexamination and intervening rights?
What is the significance of “identical” claims in patent reexamination and intervening rights? The concept of “identical” claims is crucial in determining whether intervening rights apply in patent reexamination. According to MPEP 2293: “A claim of the patent which is substantially identical to a claim of the original patent (for example, amended to improve clarity)…
Read MoreWhat are the requirements for patent owners in merged reexamination proceedings?
When reexamination proceedings are merged, patent owners must adhere to specific requirements: Maintain identical claims in all merged files. Submit a single response addressed to all files, filed in duplicate, with signatures and identifying data for all files. If claims are not identical at the time of merger, provide an amendment within one month to…
Read MoreHow do intervening rights apply to ex parte reexamination certificates?
How do intervening rights apply to ex parte reexamination certificates? Intervening rights apply to ex parte reexamination certificates in the same way they apply to reissue patents. According to MPEP 2293: “35 U.S.C. 307(b) provides that statements in an ex parte reexamination certificate do not have the effect of the statements provided in 35 U.S.C.…
Read More