How does an examiner group inventions in a restriction requirement?
When grouping inventions in a restriction requirement, examiners follow specific guidelines outlined in MPEP 817. The process involves: Identifying each group by Roman numeral Listing claims in each group Providing a short description of the subject matter claimed in each group Classifying each group The MPEP provides form paragraphs for examiners to use when grouping…
Read MoreWhat are the form paragraphs used in restriction requirements for product and process of using?
The MPEP 806.05(h) specifies that form paragraphs 8.20 and 8.21.04 should be used in restriction requirements between the product and method of using. These form paragraphs serve specific purposes: Form Paragraph 8.20: Used to explain the relationship between product and process of use inventions and to state the reasons for distinctness. Form Paragraph 8.21.04: Provides…
Read MoreWhat form paragraph should examiners use when reopening prosecution after an appeal brief?
Examiners should use Form Paragraph 12.239 when reopening prosecution after an appeal brief has been filed. According to MPEP 1207.04, this form paragraph is specifically designed for this purpose: “Form paragraph 12.239 may be used when reopening prosecution:” The form paragraph includes important information for the appellant, such as the reason for reopening prosecution, the…
Read MoreHow does an examiner acknowledge an election without traverse?
An examiner acknowledges an election without traverse using specific form paragraphs. According to MPEP 821.02, the examiner uses: Form paragraph 8.25.01 for a clear election without traverse Form paragraph 8.25.02 for an election treated as without traverse due to an incomplete reply For example, form paragraph 8.25.01 states: Applicant’s election without traverse of [1] in…
Read MoreHow should an examiner indicate the use of form paragraphs in Office actions?
According to MPEP 707, an examiner should clearly indicate the use of form paragraphs in Office actions. The MPEP states: “In all Office actions, the examiner or the Office must indicate, in the Office action itself, which form paragraphs are being relied upon, to permit the applicant to more easily identify the specific grounds of…
Read MoreHow does an examiner evaluate affidavits or declarations under 37 CFR 1.132?
The primary examiner is responsible for evaluating affidavits or declarations under 37 CFR 1.132. According to the MPEP: It is the responsibility of the primary examiner to personally review and decide whether affidavits or declarations under 37 CFR 1.132 and other evidence submitted for the purpose of traversing grounds of rejection are responsive to the…
Read MoreHow should examiners handle the modification of Form Paragraphs?
Examiners are instructed to avoid modifying Form Paragraphs unnecessarily. The MPEP 707 states: “Examiners should no longer modify the language of form paragraphs by making minor changes to the wording. If the form paragraph does not require the specific change to the language being made by the examiner, a new form paragraph should be developed…
Read MoreWhat form paragraphs should examiners use when responding to applicant’s arguments?
Examiners have several form paragraphs available to respond to applicant’s arguments, depending on the situation. According to MPEP 707.07(f): Form paragraphs 7.37 through 7.37.13 may be used where applicant’s arguments are not persuasive. Form paragraphs 7.38 through 7.38.02 may be used where applicant’s arguments are moot or persuasive. These form paragraphs cover various scenarios, such…
Read MoreWhat are form paragraphs in the context of requirements for information?
Form paragraphs are pre-written text segments used by patent examiners to standardize and streamline the process of creating requirements for information. The MPEP provides specific form paragraphs for various aspects of the requirement, including: The heading of the requirement (Form Paragraph 7.105) Specific types of information requests (e.g., Form Paragraphs 7.106 – 7.121) Concluding paragraphs…
Read MoreHow should an examiner indicate a first action final rejection?
When an examiner needs to make a first action final rejection, they should use specific form paragraphs provided in the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP). According to MPEP 706.07(b): “A first action final rejection should be made by using Form Paragraphs 7.41 or 7.41.03, as appropriate.” The MPEP provides specific form paragraphs for different…
Read More