What happens if an Office employee identifies a patent that may warrant reexamination?

If a USPTO employee identifies a patent that they believe clearly warrants reexamination, there is a specific internal process to follow. According to MPEP 2239: “If an Office employee becomes aware of an unusual fact situation in a patent which the employee considers to clearly warrant reexamination, a memorandum setting forth these facts (including a…

Read More

Can members of the public request the Director to initiate reexamination?

While members of the public can request reexamination through standard procedures, the USPTO generally does not consider requests for the Director to initiate reexamination on their own. The MPEP 2239 states: “The Director of the USPTO will not normally consider requests to order reexamination at the Director’s initiative received from members of the public. If…

Read More

How often does the Director order reexamination on their own initiative?

According to MPEP 2239, reexamination ordered at the Director’s initiative is uncommon: “A decision to order reexamination at the Director’s initiative is, however, rare. Only in compelling circumstances, after a review of all the facts concerning the patent, would such a decision be made.” This indicates that while the Director has the authority to order…

Read More

Who has the authority to order reexamination at the Director’s initiative?

The authority to order reexamination at the Director’s initiative is delegated to specific high-ranking officials within the USPTO. According to MPEP 2239: “Authority to order reexamination at the Director’s initiative has been delegated to the Deputy Commissioner for Patents who oversees the Office of Petitions. A decision to order reexamination at the Director’s initiative may…

Read More