How should a patent examiner format a requirement for information?
A patent examiner should format a requirement for information according to the guidelines provided in MPEP 704.14(a). The format should include: Clear statement: Explicitly state that the requirement is being made under 37 CFR 1.105 Time period: Specify a time period for reply, typically between one and three months Warning: Include a warning that failure…
Read MoreHow should a requirement for information be formatted?
According to the MPEP, a requirement for information should be formatted as follows: It should clearly indicate that it’s a requirement under 37 CFR 1.105 It should state the basis for the requirement It should specify what information is being required It should indicate the particular art area involved and the specific claimed subject matter…
Read MoreWhat are form paragraphs in the context of requirements for information?
Form paragraphs are pre-written text segments used by patent examiners to standardize and streamline the process of creating requirements for information. The MPEP provides specific form paragraphs for various aspects of the requirement, including: The heading of the requirement (Form Paragraph 7.105) Specific types of information requests (e.g., Form Paragraphs 7.106 – 7.121) Concluding paragraphs…
Read MoreCan a follow-up requirement be issued after a reply to a 37 CFR 1.105 requirement?
Yes, a follow-up requirement can be issued after a reply to a 37 CFR 1.105 requirement, but only when it is both reasonable and warranted based on the specific circumstances of the case. MPEP 704.12(b) states: “Depending on the facts surrounding the requirement and the reply, a follow up requirement may be made where both…
Read MoreWhat are examples of information that may be reasonably required during patent examination?
The MPEP provides several examples of information that may be reasonably required during patent examination under 37 CFR 1.105(a)(1)(i)-(viii). Some of these examples include: Names and citations of relevant indexed journals or treatises Trade names of goods or services related to the claimed subject matter Citations and copies of advertising and promotional literature for goods…
Read MoreWhat is the examiner’s responsibility regarding art submitted in response to a 37 CFR 1.105 requirement?
Examiners have a specific responsibility to consider art submitted in response to a 37 CFR 1.105 requirement. The MPEP states: “Art that is submitted in response to a 37 CFR 1.105 requirement must be considered, at least to the extent that art submitted with an Information Disclosure Statement under 37 CFR 1.97 and 1.98 is…
Read MoreWhat is the examiner’s obligation after receiving an applicant’s reply to a 37 CFR 1.105 requirement?
The examiner has a clear obligation to consider the information submitted with the applicant’s reply and apply it appropriately. This obligation stems from the examiner’s assertion that the information is necessary for examination. Specifically, the MPEP states: “The examiner must consider the information submitted with the applicant’s reply and apply the information as the examiner…
Read MoreCan an examiner deny considering information submitted in reply to a 37 CFR 1.105 requirement?
No, an examiner cannot deny considering information that is submitted in reply to a 37 CFR 1.105 requirement, as long as it is within the scope of that requirement. The MPEP is explicit on this point: “It is never appropriate to deny considering information that is submitted in reply to, and is within the scope…
Read MoreWhat is the examiner’s obligation after receiving a reply to a requirement for information?
After receiving a reply to a requirement for information under 37 CFR 1.105, the examiner has several obligations: Consider the information submitted in the applicant’s reply Apply the information as deemed appropriate to the examination For search-related information, indicate which areas were used and which were not in performing a search For answers to queries,…
Read MoreWhat are the criteria for making a requirement for information under 37 CFR 1.105?
The MPEP outlines specific criteria for making a requirement for information under 37 CFR 1.105: Reasonable Necessity: The information must be reasonably necessary for the examination or treatment of a matter in the application. Factual Information: The requirement should seek facts and factual information known to the applicant or readily obtained after reasonable inquiry. Minimized…
Read More