How does timely disclosure of information affect patent validity?
Timely disclosure of information can significantly affect patent validity. The MPEP states: The presumption of validity is generally strong when prior art was before and considered by the Office and weak when it was not. This means that when relevant information is disclosed promptly and considered by the USPTO during examination, the resulting patent is…
Read MoreWhat is considered ‘substantive involvement’ in a patent application?
The MPEP doesn’t provide a precise definition of ‘substantive involvement’, but it does offer guidance on who is considered substantively involved in the preparation or prosecution of a patent application. According to 37 CFR 1.56(c), this includes: “Every other person who is substantively involved in the preparation or prosecution of the application and who is…
Read MoreWhat is the proper way to submit corrections to a patent application?
When submitting corrections to a patent application, it’s important to do so in a clear and transparent manner. The MPEP 2011 provides guidance on this process: “In order to assure that any correction is fully considered by the examiner, applicants should file the correction ‘openly’, as in filing the correction under separate cover so that…
Read MoreWhat sources of information are covered by the duty of disclosure under 37 CFR 1.56?
The duty of disclosure under 37 CFR 1.56 covers all material information that individuals are aware of, regardless of the source. This includes information from: Co-workers Trade shows Communications with competitors or potential infringers Related foreign applications Prior or copending U.S. patent applications Related litigation and post-grant proceedings Preliminary examination searches Information related to regulatory…
Read MoreWhat is the role of attorneys or agents in disclosing information to the USPTO?
Attorneys and agents play a crucial role in disclosing information to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) during the patent application process. According to MPEP 2002.01: “37 CFR 1.56(d) makes clear that information may be disclosed to the Office through an attorney or agent of record … and that other individuals may satisfy…
Read MoreWho is responsible for disclosing prior art from foreign applications?
According to MPEP 2001.06(a), the responsibility for disclosing prior art from foreign applications extends to “Applicants and other individuals, as set forth in 37 CFR 1.56.” This includes: Inventors Patent attorneys or agents Every person substantively involved in the preparation or prosecution of the application It’s important to note that this responsibility extends to foreign…
Read MoreWhat is the requirement for copying claims from a patent?
When claims are copied or substantially copied from a patent, there is a specific requirement under patent law. According to MPEP 2001.06(d): “37 CFR 41.202(a) requires the applicant, at the time he or she presents the claim(s), to identify the patent and the numbers of the patent claims.” This means that when an applicant includes…
Read MoreWhat are the requirements for filing a patent protest?
Filing a patent protest has specific requirements as outlined in the MPEP. The document states that “Protests should be in conformance with 37 CFR 1.291(a) and (b), and include a statement of the alleged facts involved, the point or points to be reviewed, and the action requested.” Additionally, the MPEP advises that “Any briefs or…
Read MoreCan a patent be reissued if fraud was committed in the original application?
No, a patent cannot be reissued if fraud was committed in the original application. The MPEP is clear on this point: It is clear that “fraud” cannot be purged through the reissue process. This statement is supported by case law, as the MPEP cites: Where such a condition [fraudulent or deceptive intention] is shown to…
Read MoreCan a reissue application be used to submit previously withheld information?
Can a reissue application be used to submit previously withheld information? While a reissue application can be used to submit previously withheld information, it cannot cure or remedy the original withholding if it constituted inequitable conduct. The MPEP 2012 states: “In cases where an applicant seeks to use a reissue application to submit previously withheld…
Read More