How does a CPA affect the examination process and priority?
Filing a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) can impact the examination process and priority. Key points include: CPAs are generally treated as “amended” applications for examination priority purposes This may result in faster first Office actions compared to new applications Preliminary amendments should be filed with the CPA to avoid potential denial of entry Information Disclosure…
Read MoreHow does a CPA affect benefit claims and references to prior applications?
A Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) has specific effects on benefit claims and references to prior applications: The CPA request itself serves as the specific reference required by 35 U.S.C. 120 No amendment to the specification or application data sheet is required or permitted to reference the prior application A CPA automatically includes a benefit claim…
Read MoreWhat are the filing requirements for a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) under 37 CFR 1.53(d)?
The filing requirements for a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) under 37 CFR 1.53(d) are as follows: The CPA must be filed before the earliest of: Payment of the issue fee on the prior application, unless a petition under 37 CFR 1.313(c) is granted; Abandonment of the prior application; or Termination of proceedings on the prior…
Read MoreWhen is a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) acceptable?
A Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) is acceptable when it meets the requirements set forth in 37 CFR 1.53(d). According to MPEP § 201, the examiner will use specific language to indicate acceptance: The request filed on [date] for a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) under 37 CFR 1.53(d) based on parent Application No. [number] is acceptable…
Read MoreHow does an examiner notify an applicant about a CPA’s acceptance?
According to MPEP § 201, specifically paragraph 2.30, an examiner notifies an applicant about a Continued Prosecution Application’s (CPA) acceptance in the first Office action of the CPA. The MPEP states: Use this form paragraph in the first Office action of a CPA to advise the applicant that a request for a CPA is acceptable…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle ‘conditional’ requests for CPAs?
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) treats all ‘conditional’ requests for Continued Prosecution Applications (CPAs) as unconditional requests. This is clearly stated in MPEP ¶ 2.35: “Any ‘conditional’ request for a CPA submitted as a separate paper is treated as an unconditional request for a CPA.” This means that once a CPA request…
Read MoreAre Continued Prosecution Applications (CPAs) available for all types of patent applications?
No, Continued Prosecution Applications (CPAs) are not available for all types of patent applications. They are specifically limited to design patent applications. This is evident from the MPEP guidance, which states: ‘Use this form paragraph to inform applicant that a request for a CPA in a design application is not in compliance with 37 CFR…
Read MoreHow can I delete a named inventor when filing a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA)?
When filing a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) for a design patent, you can request the deletion of a named inventor by submitting a statement with your CPA filing. The MPEP ¶ 2.32 states: “Receipt is acknowledged of the statement requesting that [1] be deleted as a named inventor which was filed with the Continued Prosecution…
Read MoreCan I add an inventor when filing a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA)?
The MPEP ¶ 2.32 specifically addresses the deletion of inventors in a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) for design patents, but it does not directly discuss adding inventors. However, changes to inventorship in patent applications are generally governed by 37 CFR 1.48. If you need to add an inventor when filing a CPA, it’s advisable to:…
Read MoreWhen should I file a 37 CFR 1.48 request for a CPA?
You should file a 37 CFR 1.48 request for a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) whenever you need to add, remove, or change the order of inventors from the original application. The MPEP ¶ 2.33 indicates: Any request to add an inventor must be in the form of a request under 37 CFR 1.48. This applies…
Read More