PCT AI Section 112 — Ceasing of Effect under Articles 24(1)(iii) and 39(2), Review — MPEP Index – BlueIron IP
PCT AI Section 112 Ceasing of Effect under Articles 24(1)(iii) and 39(2), Review
Source: PCT Administrative InstructionBlueIron Update:
This page consolidates MPEP guidance interpreting PCT AI Section 112, including 0 rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only, it is not legal advice.
Official MPEP § 112 — Ceasing of Effect under Articles 24(1)(iii) and 39(2), Review
Source: USPTOLast Modified: 10/30/2024 08:50:22
112 Ceasing of Effect under Articles 24(1)(iii) and 39(2), Review under Article 25(2) and Maintaining of Effect under Articles 24(2) and 39(3)
- (a) Each national Office shall, in its capacity as designated Office,
notify the International Bureau once a year of:
- (i) the number of international applications in respect of which, during the preceding calendar year, the time limit applicable under Article 22 has expired;
- (ii) the number of international applications in respect of which, during the preceding calendar year, the requirements provided for in Article 22 have not been complied with before the expiration of the time limit applicable under that Article, with the consequence that the effects of the international applications concerned have ceased under Article 24(1)(iii) .
- (b) Each national Office shall, in its capacity as elected Office,
notify the International Bureau once a year of:
- (i) the number of international applications in respect of which, during the preceding calendar year, the time limit applicable under Article 39(1) has expired;
- (ii) the number of international applications in respect of which, during the preceding calendar year, the requirements provided for in Article 39(1) have not been complied with before the expiration of the time limit applicable under that Article, with the consequence that the effects of the international applications concerned have ceased under Article 39(3) .
- (c) Where, under Article 25(2) , the designated Office decides that the refusal, declaration or finding referred to in Article 25(1) was not justified, it shall promptly notify the International Bureau that it will treat the international application as if the error or omission referred to in Article 25(2) had not occurred. The notification shall preferably contain the reasons for the decision of the designated Office.
- (d) Where, under Article 24(2) or under Article 39(3) , the designated or elected Office maintains the effect provided for in Article 11(3) , it shall promptly notify the International Bureau accordingly. The notification shall preferably contain the reasons for the decision of the designated or elected Office.