PCT Rule 2 — Interpretation of Certain Words (MPEP Coverage Index) – BlueIron IP
PCT Rule 2 Interpretation of Certain Words
This page consolidates MPEP guidance interpreting PCT Rule 2, including 8 rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only, it is not legal advice.
Summary
This section details the definitions provided by PCT Article 2 and Rule 2, ensuring clarity and consistency in patent applications. Adhering to these interpretations is essential for compliance with the PCT framework.
What this section covers
- Defines terms used in the PCT through PCT Article 2 and Rule 2.
Key obligations
- Adhere to the definitions provided in PCT Article 2 and Rule 2 for clarity and consistency.
- Ensure any interpretation or use of these definitions aligns with the PCT's requirements.
Practice notes
- Consult the full text of PCT Article 2 and Rule 2 for specific definitions and their application.
- Avoid using non-standard or ambiguous terms that may lead to misinterpretation.
Official MPEP § 2 — Interpretation of Certain Words
Source: USPTOLast Modified: 10/30/2024 08:50:22
Rule 2 Interpretation of Certain Words
2.1 “Applicant”
Whenever the word “applicant” is used, it shall be construed as meaning also the agent or other representative of the applicant, except where the contrary clearly follows from the wording or the nature of the provision, or the context in which the word is used, such as, in particular, where the provision refers to the residence or nationality of the applicant.
2.2 “Agent”
Whenever the word “agent” is used, it shall be construed as meaning an agent appointed under Rule 90.1 , unless the contrary clearly follows from the wording or the nature of the provision, or the context in which the word is used.
2.2 bis “Common Representative”
Whenever the expression “common representative” is used, it shall be construed as meaning an applicant appointed as, or considered to be, the common representative under Rule 90.2 .
2.3 “Signature”
Whenever the word “signature” is used, it shall be understood that, if the national law applied by the receiving Office or the competent International Searching or Preliminary Examining Authority requires the use of a seal instead of a signature, the word, for the purposes of that Office or Authority, shall mean seal.
2.4 “Priority Period”
- (a) Whenever the term “priority period” is used in relation to a priority claim, it shall be construed as meaning the period of 12 months from the filing date of the earlier application whose priority is so claimed. The day of filing of the earlier application shall not be included in that period.
- (b) Rule 80.5 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the priority period.
-
- Pct Amendments Article 19
- Pct Filing
| MPEP Section | Rules |
|---|---|
| MPEP § 1802 | |
| MPEP § 1828.01 |