37 CFR § 1.145 — Subsequent presentation of claims for different (MPEP Index) – BlueIron IP

37 CFR § 1.145 Subsequent presentation of claims for different

Source: Patent Rule (37 CFR)BlueIron Update:

This page consolidates MPEP guidance interpreting 37 CFR § 1.145, including 14 rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only, it is not legal advice.

Summary

This section discusses the rules governing the subsequent presentation of claims when filing a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA), preventing applicants from switching inventions by presenting independent and distinct claims.

What this section covers

  • This section covers the rules for filing a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) and how to present claims that are consistent with the original disclosure without introducing new matter.

Key obligations

  • Applicants cannot obtain continued examination on claims that are independent and distinct from the invention previously claimed.
  • Any new claims must be consistent with the original disclosure and not introduce new matter.

Practice notes

  • Practitioners should ensure that any new claims in a CPA are consistent with the original disclosure and do not introduce new matter.
  • Practitioners are warned against attempting to switch inventions by presenting independent and distinct claims in a CPA, as this is not allowed.

Related Provisions

Based on MPEP Last Modified: 10/30/2024 08:50:22