37 CFR § 1.126 — Numbering of claims. (MPEP Coverage Index) – BlueIron IP

37 CFR § 1.126 Numbering of claims.

Source: Patent Rule (37 CFR)BlueIron Update:

This page consolidates MPEP guidance interpreting 37 CFR § 1.126, including 11 rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only, it is not legal advice.

Summary

This section outlines the specific requirements for claim numbering in patent applications, ensuring that claims are renumbered consistently and logically to comply with 37 CFR 1.126.

What this section covers

  • The section covers the requirement for claim numbering as required by 37 CFR 1.126, focusing on maintaining consistent dependency relationships between claims.

Key obligations

  • Claims must be renumbered as required by 37 CFR 1.126, preserving the original numbering throughout prosecution.
  • Dependent claims must be consistent with their parent claims, ensuring logical dependencies are maintained.
  • Canceled claims cannot be reinstated without presenting them as new claims with a new claim number, preserving the original numbering.

Practice notes

  • Review all claims for consistency after renumbering to ensure compliance with 37 CFR 1.126.
  • Maintain clear and logical claim dependencies to avoid confusion during prosecution.

Related Provisions

Based on MPEP Last Modified: 10/30/2024 08:50:22