37 CFR § 1.1051 — Relief from prescribed time (MPEP Coverage Index) – BlueIron IP
37 CFR § 1.1051 Relief from prescribed time
Source: Patent Rule (37 CFR)BlueIron Update:
This page consolidates MPEP guidance interpreting 37 CFR § 1.1051, including 21 rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only, it is not legal advice.
Summary
This section provides petitions for relief from prescribed time limits under the Hague Agreement, specifically addressing requirements and conditions for filing such petitions with the Director of International Patent Legal Administration.
What this section covers
- Defines petitions to the Director of International Patent Legal Administration for relief from prescribed time limits under the Hague Agreement.
Key obligations
- File a petition with sufficient evidence of extraordinary circumstances justifying relief from prescribed time limits.
- Provide detailed explanation of the circumstances that prevented timely action to increase likelihood of approval.
- Adhere to specific requirements and deadlines set forth in 37 CFR 1.1051.
Practice notes
- Ensure all required information is included in the petition to increase the likelihood of approval.
- Failing to provide sufficient evidence of extraordinary circumstances may lead to denial of the petition.
Official MPEP § 1.1051 — Relief from prescribed time
Source: USPTOLast Modified: 10/30/2024 08:50:22
1.1051 Relief from prescribed time limits.
- (a) If the delay in an applicant’s failure
to act within prescribed time limits under the Hague Agreement in
connection with requirements pertaining to an international design
application was unintentional, a petition may be filed pursuant to
this section to excuse the failure to act as to the United States.
A grantable petition pursuant to this section must be accompanied
by:
- (1) A copy of any invitation sent from the International Bureau setting a prescribed time limit for which applicant failed to timely act;
- (2) The reply required under paragraph (c) of this section, unless previously filed;
- (3) The fee as set forth in § 1.17(m) ;
- (4) A certified copy of the originally filed international design application, unless a copy of the international design application was previously communicated to the Office from the International Bureau or the international design application was filed with the Office as an office of indirect filing, and a translation thereof into the English language if it was filed in another language;
- (5) A statement that the entire delay in filing the required reply from the due date for the reply until the filing of a grantable petition pursuant to this paragraph was unintentional. The Director may require additional information where there is a question whether the delay was unintentional; and
- (6) A terminal disclaimer (and fee as set forth in § 1.20(d) ) required pursuant to paragraph (d) of this section.
- (b) Any request for reconsideration or review of a decision refusing to excuse the applicant’s failure to act within prescribed time limits in connection with requirements pertaining to an international design application upon petition filed pursuant to this section, to be considered timely, must be filed within two months of the decision refusing to excuse or within such time as set in the decision. Unless a decision indicates otherwise, this time period may be extended under the provisions of § 1.136 .
- (c)
Reply. The reply required may be:
- (1) The filing of a continuing application. If the international design application has not been subject to international registration, the reply must also include a grantable petition under § 1.1023(b) to accord the international design application a filing date; or
- (2) A grantable petition under § 1.1052 , where the international design application was filed with the Office as an office of indirect filing.
- (d) Terminal disclaimer. Any petition pursuant to this section must be accompanied by a terminal disclaimer and fee as set forth in § 1.321 dedicating to the public a terminal part of the term of any patent granted thereon equivalent to the period beginning on the due date for the reply for which applicant failed to timely act and ending on the date of filing of the reply required under paragraph (c) of this section and must also apply to any patent granted on a continuing design application that contains a specific reference under 35 U.S.C. 120 , 121 , 365(c) or 386(c) to the application for which relief under this section is sought.
[Added, 80 FR 17918, Apr. 2, 2015, effective May 13, 2015]
- Application Types
- App Types Provisional
- Design Patents
- Design Double Patenting
- Director Authority
-
-
- Ida Requirements
- Ida Contents
-
-
| MPEP Section | Rules |
|---|---|
| MPEP § 1002.02(p) | |
| MPEP § 2913 | |
| MPEP § 2914 |