35 U.S.C. § 162 — Description, claim (MPEP Coverage Index) – BlueIron IP
35 U.S.C. § 162 Description, claim
This page consolidates MPEP guidance interpreting 35 U.S.C. § 162, including 18 rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only, it is not legal advice.
Summary
This section ensures that plant patents are not invalidated for noncompliance with section 112 if the description is as complete and detailed as possible, ensuring robust protection.
What this section covers
- Addresses the requirements for plant patents in terms of description and claims under USC 35.
- Covers the standard for plant patents not to be invalidated due to noncompliance with section 112 if the description is as complete as possible.
Key obligations
- Plant patents shall not be declared invalid for noncompliance with section 112 if the description is as complete as possible.
- The claim must be supported by a complete and detailed description in the specification.
- Compliance with this standard is tied to USC 35 and CFR authority.
Practice notes
- Ensure the description is as complete as possible, even if it may not fully comply with section 112.
- Avoid underdescribing the plant, as it could lead to invalidation of the patent.
Official MPEP § 162 — Description, claim
Source: USPTOLast Modified: 10/30/2024 08:50:22
35 U.S.C. 162 Description, claim.
No plant patent shall be declared invalid for noncompliance with section 112 if the description is as complete as is reasonably possible.
The claim in the specification shall be in formal terms to the plant shown and described.
(Amended Sept. 16, 2011, Public Law 112-29, sec. 20(j) (effective Sept. 16, 2012), 125 Stat. 284.)
- Design Patents
- Design Application
- Patent Application Content
- Specification
-
- Plant Specification
- Section 101
- Statutory Categories
| MPEP Section | Rules |
|---|---|
| MPEP § 1601 | |
| MPEP § 1605 | |
| MPEP § 1608 | |
| MPEP § 2403.02 | |
| MPEP § 601.01(e) |